Dr. Ankita Dayal vs The State Of U.P


?Court No. – 21

Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. – 697 of 2015

Applicant :- Dr. Ankita Dayal
Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P
Counsel for Applicant :- H.B Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate

Hon’ble Vishnu Chandra Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
By means of this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for quashing the criminal proceedings of Complaint Case No. 4707 of 2013 and summoning order dated 16.02.2015, under Sections 23, 25 of P.C.P.N.D.T. Act, Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District- Bahraich pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Bahraich filed under Section 28 of P.C.P.N.D.T. Act.
From the perusal of material on record, it could not be said that no case is made out against the petitioner. Therefore, at this stage no interference is called for by this Court. The petition lacks merit.
However, if the petitioner surrenders before the court below within three weeks from today and moves bail application, the same shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law and also keeping in view the directions contained in the judgment delivered by the Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) (Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.), in case the accused petitioner has not yet been surrendered and applied for bail.
For three weeks or till the date of surrender, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
With this observation, the petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 17.3.2015


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s